Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +211%
6.774 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1042 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.04 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.774 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.774 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GA107
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GA107-325-K2-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy