Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1755MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM +271%
8.087 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1515 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.16 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
126.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.087 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.087 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
126.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GA106
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GA106-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
12 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy