Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA P106 090

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
P106 090 +8%
2.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jul 2017
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GP106
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy