Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV560
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy