Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +31%
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
10
1280
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy