Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI Radeon X1650

AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV516
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy