Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D500 +315%
2.227 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1536
Shading Units
216
96
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy