Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M2000 vs AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe

AMD FirePro M2000 vs AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9560 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1237MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Radeon E9560 PCIe +1087%
5.7 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Oct 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1237 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
36
480
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.58 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
178.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.700 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.700 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
356.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

33W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy