Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4000 vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD FirePro M4000 vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (33W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
0.691 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900 +89%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2011
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

33W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Chelsea
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy