Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition

AMD FirePro M4000 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 50.82GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000 +20%
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition
0.574 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2011
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Vancouver
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
794 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
50.82GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
480
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.784 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.35 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
574.1 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

33W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Chelsea
GPU Name
Whistler
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
Whistler PRO (216-0810005)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy