Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 965M +129%
2.355 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Jan 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
935 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
GM206S
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy