Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon E8950

AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon E8950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon E8950 +300%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Sep 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
256.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
Amethyst
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
E8950
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy