Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 90W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2034MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600M +611%
7.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1224 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2034 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
28
-
SM Count
66
640
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.2 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
227.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.58 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.290 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
Navi 23
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
Navi 23 WKS-XM
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy