Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro M4000

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro M4000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (33W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +89%
1.306 TFLOPS
FirePro M4000
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Chelsea
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Chelsea XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy