Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce MX550 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1320MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce MX550 +106%
2.703 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1320 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.12 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.703 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.703 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
TU117
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
MX550
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy