Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q Refresh

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q Refresh

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q Refresh 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (259.8GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q Refresh +252%
4.608 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
960 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1353 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
259.8GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
960
Shading Units
1920
48
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.216 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.608 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
144.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
TU106B
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy