Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile 16 GB

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile 16 GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
5184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile 16 GB +1353%
18.98 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
960
Shading Units
6144
48
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
148.3 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.98 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GA104
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
GA104-775-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy