Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R5 A240

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R5 A240

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 A240 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +98%
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 A240
0.659 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
5
960
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Jet
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Jet XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy