Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300M +182%
3.686 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.80 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
115.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.373 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.686 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Navi 24
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XML
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy