Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro R5000 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD FirePro R5000 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro R5000 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro R5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro R5000 +3148%
1.267 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro Remote
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT218
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy