Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +3461%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
80
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy