Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 +6183%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Mar 2019
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.1GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
80
Shading Units
1408
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
120W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy