Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition +3962%
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Apr 2013
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
195W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy