Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
19376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +102050%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Oct 2024
FirePro Remote
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
19456
8
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
153 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy