Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +4080%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro Remote
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy