Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal +13612%
10.97 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Aug 2016
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
80
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy