Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs Intel Arc Pro A50

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 147% (2350MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +41%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
75W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-128
Orthrus
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy