Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +56%
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy