Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +5%
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
225W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy