CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
+535%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
216
112
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200
Orthrus
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
375W
TDP
182W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
5
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs Intel Arc Pro A60
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
7
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
8
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
9
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI Radeon HD 5550
10
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy