AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

VS

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 6 months late

Boost Clock950MHz

More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)

1576 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages

Lower TDP (182W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +535%

3.405 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

0.536 TFLOPS

FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Graphics Card

Mar 2014

Release Date

Sep 2008

FirePro

Generation

GeForce 200

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz

Base Clock

-

950 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1250 MHz

Memory Clock

999 MHz

Memory

6GB

Memory Size

896MB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR3

384bit

Memory Bus

448bit

240.0GB/s

Bandwidth

111.9GB/s

Render Config

28

Compute Units

-

SM Count

27

1792

Shading Units

216

112

TMUs

72

32

ROPs

28

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

-

768 KB

L2 Cache

224 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

16.13 GPixel/s

106.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

41.47 GTexel/s

-

3.405 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

536.5 GFLOPS

851.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W

TDP

182W

750 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

2x DVI 1x S-Video

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti

GPU Name

GT200

Orthrus

GPU Variant

G200-103-A2

GCN 1.0

Architecture

Tesla 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

65 nm

4.313 billion

Transistors

1.4 billion

352 mm²

Die Size

576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)

DirectX

11.1 (10_0)

4.6

OpenGL

3.3

1.2

OpenCL

1.1

1.2

Vulkan

N/A

-

CUDA

1.3

5.1

Shader Model

4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD FirePro S9010

2

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

3

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

4

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

5

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI

6

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

7

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

8

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM

9

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS

10

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

Related News

1

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

2

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

3

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

4

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

5

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

6

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

7

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

8

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

9

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

10

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early