Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +319%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650
0.812 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Sep 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.464 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
812.5 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
65W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK107
Orthrus
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy