Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +374%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
55W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy