Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +343%
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
480
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
75W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Turks
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy