Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +240%
3.405 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy