Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 17.02GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +1673%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Dec 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
266 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
17.02GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
64
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G94
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
95W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy