AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

VS

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock950MHz

More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)

1552 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages

Lower TDP (219W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

FirePro S10000 Passive +447%

3.405 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

0.622 TFLOPS

FirePro S10000 Passive

VS

GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

Graphics Card

Nov 2012

Release Date

Feb 2010

FirePro

Generation

GeForce 200

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz

Base Clock

-

950 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1250 MHz

Memory Clock

1134 MHz

Memory

3GB

Memory Size

896MB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR3

384bit

Memory Bus

448bit

240.0GB/s

Bandwidth

127.0GB/s

Render Config

28

Compute Units

-

SM Count

30

1792

Shading Units

240

112

TMUs

80

32

ROPs

28

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

-

768 KB

L2 Cache

224 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

17.72 GPixel/s

106.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

50.64 GTexel/s

-

3.405 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

622.1 GFLOPS

851.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W

TDP

219W

750 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

2x DVI

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti

GPU Name

G92B

Tahiti PRO GL

GPU Variant

G92-421-B1

GCN 1.0

Architecture

Tesla

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

55 nm

4.313 billion

Transistors

0.754 billion

352 mm²

Die Size

260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)

DirectX

11.1 (10_0)

4.6

OpenGL

3.3

1.2

OpenCL

1.1

1.2

Vulkan

N/A

-

CUDA

1.3

5.1

Shader Model

4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

2

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

3

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

4

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

5

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon HD 8870 OEM

6

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

7

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon HD 6670

8

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

9

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

10

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon 550X

Related News

1

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

2

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

3

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

4

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

5

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

6

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

7

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

8

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

9

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

10

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption