Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.19GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +225%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2
1.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Sep 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.19GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
1792
Shading Units
336
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
160W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF114
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy