Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs MTT S30

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs MTT S30

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM MTT S30 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 224GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
MTT S30 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1300MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (40W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +30%
3.405 TFLOPS
MTT S30
2.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro
Generation
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
32
ROPs
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
768 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.6 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
40W
750 W
Suggested PSU
W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
SuDi
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.1
Shader Model

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy