Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA P102 100

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA P102 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (1683MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
P102 100 +216%
10.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
25
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
3200
112
TMUs
200
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GP102
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy