Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +1673%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
120
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
45W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV630
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV630 XT (215CDABKA15FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy