Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 8760 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +166%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8760 OEM
1.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2013
FirePro
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
80W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Latte XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy