Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon RX 480

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon RX 480

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 480 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 480 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1266MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 480 +71%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2016
FirePro
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2304
112
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 XT (215-0876184)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy