Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA P106 090

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1531MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +44%
3.405 TFLOPS
P106 090
2.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jul 2017
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1354 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
75W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GP106
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy