Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 8GB VRAM T1000 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T1000 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1395MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +36%
3.405 TFLOPS
T1000 8 GB
2.5 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
50W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU117
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy