Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (1665MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 +14%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
75W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU117
Zaphod
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy