Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA P104 101

AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA P104 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 4GB VRAM P104 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (1683MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
P104 101 +153%
8.617 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2018
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
269.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
134.6 GFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.617 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
269.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
125W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GP104
Zaphod
GPU Variant
GP104-101-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy