Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 145% (2331MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +5%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
50W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 24
Zaphod
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy