Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (950MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 +79%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Zaphod
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy