Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
Lower TDP (375W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +68%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
500W
750 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Vesuvius
Zaphod
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy