Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7000 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

AMD FirePro S7000 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +40%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Orthrus
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy